EXCLUSIVES

Nia Guzman Has “Not Taken Part In Criminal Activity” With Rapper King Ba, Says Rep

By  | 

Chris Brown’s baby’s mother, Nia Guzman is slamming allegations that she has taken part in criminal activity with her ex-boyfriend, King Ba.

Last week, reports broke that Ba, who also considers himself a father to Breezy’s daughter, had a warrant out for his arrest for allegedly forging U.S. Treasury checks totaling over $5,000 and depositing them into bank accounts.

And now, according to TMZ, Breezy plans on using this in court as he fight’s for custody over he and Nia’s 1-year-old daughter, Royalty. Per the news outlet, Chris thinks Nia’s argument to have supervised visits with Royalty and Brown for safety reasons will backfire … after all, Ba is a apparently a wanted man.

But the model’s rep tells HipHollywood that “Nia has not been in a dating relationship with Ba for several months” and that despite other rumors, she “has no criminal record and has never took park in any criminal activity with Ba.”

Guzman’s rep also addressed reports that Nia is money hungry and is using her daughter as meal ticket, something that Brown suggested during a Twitter rant last month. According to reports, Guzman is requesting a whopping $15,000 a month in child support instead of the $2,500 she is receiving now.

Screen Shot 2015-09-01 at 5.42.28 AM

“Nia is not trying to obtain any fame or additional money from Chris Brown other than the child support that is expected for the raising of their child and she asks that the press and general pubic would stop hurling false accusations at her and her daughter,” the statement read.

Guzman and Breezy are currently in a custody battle over their bundle of joy. Nia is asking for full custody and Chris is asking for joint.

1 Comment

  1. sheryl walton

    September 1, 2015 at 3:43 PM

    No one is making accusations against a child. The accusations are seemingly against Nia Guzman. On the child’s birthday a few months ago…Nia herself reported that her boyfriend spent money on the child. Nia herself volunteered this information. I wondered why Nia felt the public needed to know that???? Nia is the person that exposed her daughter’s privacy to us-the public. The baby is innocent. Nia was married, had a boyfriend and yet slept with another man. Nia did not know who the father of her child was…Nia let her boyfriend believe for 9 months that he was the father of the baby. This is not the baby’s fault at all. We the public never needed to know all that about this child’s history/privacy. Nia is the person that cheated with these men. I wonder..was Nia demanding money from the boyfriend too ? Nia is the person that has put questions in the public’s mind and unnecessarily exposed her daughter’s privacy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *